Survey

Feedback plenary session (HyPERiON - 1st rehearsal: Plenary session)

Overall impression
Structure and flow
Individual presentations: Overview (Jan)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA A (Cagri)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA B (Benno)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA C (Neil)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: IRTG (Vlad)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: Research data management (Jürgen)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: Diversity (Mazin)

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Additional comments & reviewer questions