Choose timezone

Your profile timezone:

Use timezone based on:

Event/category Custom

Select a custom timezone

Login

HyPERiON - 2nd rehearsal: Plenary session

Survey

Feedback plenary session (HyPERiON - 2nd rehearsal: Plenary session)

Structure and flow

Was the sequence of topics logical and easy to follow?

Yes

Partially

No

Suggestions for improvement

Did the presentation cover all relevant aspects or is content missing?

Were the key achievements and future plans clearly communicated?

Individual presentations: Overview (Jan)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA A (Cagri)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA B (Benno)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: RA C (Neil)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: IRTG (Vlad)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: Cross-cutting activities (Kerstin)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: Research data management (Jürgen)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Individual presentations: Diversity (Mazin)

Layout

Were slides clear, readable, and visually appealing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Content

Was the presentation engaging and professional? Are the main messages for the reviewers clear and convincing? Do you have suggestions for improvement?

Additional comments & reviewer questions

Do you have additional comments?

Possible reviewer comments & questions

Back

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.

Powered by Indico v3.3.9