Sep 13 – 15, 2026
KIT Campus Süd
Europe/Berlin timezone

Institut für Boden- und Felsmechanik (IBF)

Bearing Capacity Assessment of Rubble Mounds Composed of Porous Rock: A Case Study Toward Practical Application

Sep 14, 2026, 11:00 AM
20m
Geb. 40.50 (Engler-Bunte Hörsaal) (KIT Campus Süd)

Geb. 40.50 (Engler-Bunte Hörsaal)

KIT Campus Süd

Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, 76131 Karlsruhe
Engineering application Engineering application Engineering application

Speaker

Rawiwan Sukhumkitcharoen (Port and Airport Research Institute)

Description

The use of porous rock is generally not adopted in rubble mound foundations due to its higher porosity, which results in lower apparent specific gravity and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). However, in response to rising rock material costs, a rubble mound foundation at Shimizu Port, Japan, is planned to utilize materials sourced from Mount Fuji, including both dense and porous rocks. To evaluate the feasibility of porous rock, the bearing capacity behavior of the two materials was examined through two approaches: (1) large-scale triaxial tests with a specimen diameter of 0.3 m conducted under confining pressures of 50, 200, and 400 kPa to determine shear strength parameters for the Bishop method, and (2) centrifuge model tests of a caisson on rubble mounds performed at a centrifugal acceleration of 50g to reproduce the behavior of large-scale structures. The results indicate that the apparent cohesion and mobilized internal friction angle are within a similar range for both materials ($c_d$ = 29.49 kPa and $ϕ_d$ = 36.97° for dense rock; $c_p$ = 32.95 kPa and $ϕ_p$ = 35.62° for porous rock), despite an approximately threefold difference in UCS. Consequently, the allowable operational load for porous rock is reduced by only about 8% compared with dense rock, which has an estimated bearing capacity of approximately 1430 kPa at a safety factor of 1 based on the Bishop method. The response of rubble mounds under caisson overburden stress obtained from centrifuge model tests also demonstrates nearly identical displacements for both materials up to 300 kPa, corresponding to the expected operational stress level of a 15-m-high caisson, as well as ultimate bearing capacities consistent with theoretical predictions. These results suggest that porous rock can also provide adequate performance for rubble mound foundations. By bridging the gap between theoretical analysis and practical engineering applications through laboratory testing, this study highlights the potential of porous rock as an alternative material for port foundation construction.

Author

Rawiwan Sukhumkitcharoen (Port and Airport Research Institute)

Co-authors

Itsuki Sato (Port and Airport Research Institute) Masahide Otsubo (Port and Airport Research Institute) Ooki Kurihara (Port and Airport Research Institute) Hidenori Takahashi (Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.